“…NEVER INTERVIEWED A SINGLE CIA OFFICIAL”
ONLY “HALF TRUE”:-P
IS THIS AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM?
What WOULD Jesus do? O:-)
POOR RECORD OF SUCCESS…
Four Experienced Interrogators: Torture “Almost Certainly Prolonged the Hunt” For Bin Laden. In 2011, former interrogators Matthew Alexander (using a pseudonym), U.S. Army intelligence officer Col. (Ret.) Stuart Herrington, former FBI special agent Joe Navarro, and military intelligence veteran Ken Robinson issued a press release explaining that the CIA’s use of torture “almost certainly prolonged the hunt for Bin Laden”:
The use of waterboarding and other so-called “enhanced” interrogation techniques almost certainly prolonged the hunt for Bin Laden and complicated the jobs of professional U.S. interrogators who were trying to develop useful information from unwilling sources like Khalid Sheik Muhammed.
Reports say that Khalid Sheik Muhammed and Abu Faraq al-Libi did not divulge the nom de guerre of a courier during torture, but rather several months later, when they were questioned by interrogators who did not use abusive techniques.
This is not surprising. Our experience is that torture is a poor way to develop useful, accurate information.
We know from experience that it is very difficult to elicit information from a detainee who has been abused. The abuse often only strengthens their resolve and makes it that much harder for an interrogator to find a way to elicit useful information. [Huffington Post,5/5/11]
This was REPORTED in H.P.,
NOT attributed to them!
It’s available in multiple sources.
The facts are true, no matter WHO reproduces/publishes them 🙂