COMMENTS ON LAYMEN’S NOTIONS OF WHAT PASSES FOR A BASIS FOR CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED :-D

Published November 9, 2014 by wallacedarwin

ON LAYMEN’S NOTIONS OF WHAT PASSES FOR A BASIS FOR “CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED”;-)

“Sounds like a ‘good’ plan”?
Is that the new standard? 😦
THE BEST we can expect is “good”?
Good for whom?
Is the “devil in the details”?
What wrong direction?
Let’s be excruciatingly precise, without cherrypicking…all politicians take advantage of what they sense we don’t really know? :-$

“Reading the U.S.CONSTITUTION” (like “reading” the bibles) is NOT good for anything more than getting a gold star :-*
A novel, it’s NOT :-[
Scholars have studied it a lifetime without resolving it’s labyrinth of nuance :-\
SCALIA is a prime example? 😉

If “no one is more conservative” then we can expect an “ACTIVIST” in constitutional viewpoint? 😀

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: