ON LAYMEN’S NOTIONS OF WHAT PASSES FOR A BASIS FOR “CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED”;-)
“Sounds like a ‘good’ plan”?
Is that the new standard? 😦
THE BEST we can expect is “good”?
Good for whom?
Is the “devil in the details”?
What wrong direction?
Let’s be excruciatingly precise, without cherrypicking…all politicians take advantage of what they sense we don’t really know? :-$
“Reading the U.S.CONSTITUTION” (like “reading” the bibles) is NOT good for anything more than getting a gold star :-*
A novel, it’s NOT :-[
Scholars have studied it a lifetime without resolving it’s labyrinth of nuance :-\
SCALIA is a prime example? 😉
If “no one is more conservative” then we can expect an “ACTIVIST” in constitutional viewpoint? 😀